county-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| logging | {} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| extensions | {
"io.modelcontextprotocol/ui": {}
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| county_informationC | Kenya county demographics and basic statistics. DEMO. |
| county_budget_guideD | Kenya county devolution and budget information. DEMO. |
| county_services_guideC | Services available at Kenya county government level. DEMO. |
| cdf_guideC | Kenya Constituency Development Fund (CDF) guide. DEMO. |
| ward_informationD | Kenya ward-level civic information and ward representative role. DEMO. |
| county_contact_directoryD | Kenya county government contact directory. DEMO. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of Kenya county information (CDF, budget, contacts, demographics, services, wards) with no overlap in purpose, allowing clear differentiation.
All tool names follow a consistent pattern of a topic descriptor followed by a common suffix (guide, directory, information), all in snake_case, making them predictable and easy to understand.
With 6 tools covering key county-related information categories, the set is well-scoped for an informational server—neither too sparse nor overloaded.
The tool surface covers essential county information areas, but as a demo it lacks some potentially useful tools (e.g., county legislation, project tracker), though core needs are met.