church_legal_registration

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states a procedural topic ('How to register') without indicating side effects, read-only status, or any behavioral traits. The agent cannot determine if this tool performs an action or returns information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, front-loading the key information. It is minimal but contains the essential topic. The inclusion of 'DEMO' is a slight distraction but does not significantly harm structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity (no params, output schema exists), the description is brief. It covers the registration topic and location (Kenya), but does not elaborate on what the tool actually provides (e.g., steps, forms, requirements). The 'DEMO' hint is useful but could be clearer about the tool's purpose within the context of sibling guides.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so schema description coverage is trivially 100%. The description adds no parameter information, but none is needed. The baseline for no parameters is 4, and the description does not detract from that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'How to register a religious organization in Kenya', which indicates the tool provides guidance on registration. However, it does not use a verb+resource format and includes 'DEMO', which may confuse about its actual functionality. It distinguishes from siblings by focusing on registration, but lacks a clear action verb.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like the sibling tools. The description does not mention any prerequisites, limitations, or exclusions, leaving the agent with no direction on appropriate use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.