list_triggers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description discloses that internal/constraint triggers are excluded and that triggers may cascade side effects, providing useful behavioral context beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (two sentences), front-loaded with the main action, and each sentence adds value. No fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (2 simple parameters, output schema exists), the description covers the essential: what the tool does, its scope, and an important behavioral note. No gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds limited meaning: it clarifies the 'schema' parameter as the target schema and 'table' as an optional filter. More detail on parameter constraints or defaults would improve it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists triggers in a schema, optionally filtered by table, and includes full CREATE TRIGGER definitions. It also mentions exclusions, distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_constraints.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives a usage hint to review before writes due to possible side effects, but does not specify when to use this tool over alternatives or provide exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.