ai-market-intelligence
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_modelsB | Lista os perfis de modelos presentes no catálogo local. |
| recommend_modelC | Ordena modelos do catálogo para um cenário, orçamento e requisito de hospedagem própria. |
| compare_modelsB | Compara até quatro modelos para um cenário específico e mostra a classificação. |
| explain_scenariosA | Explica os cenários avaliados e os pesos usados pelo mecanismo de recomendação. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The tools are mostly distinct: list_models lists catalog items, recommend_model ranks them, compare_models compares a subset, and explain_scenarios describes the reasoning. However, recommend_model and compare_models could be confused since both rank/compare for a scenario, though compare_models explicitly limits to four.
All tools follow a verb_noun pattern (list_models, recommend_model, compare_models, explain_scenarios). However, the verbs vary in style - 'list', 'recommend', 'compare' are action verbs, while 'explain' is also action but the noun 'scenarios' differs from 'models' - but the pattern is consistent.
With 4 tools, the set is slightly small for a domain that includes model cataloging, recommendation, comparison, and explanation, but it is reasonable for a focused utility. Each tool serves a distinct function and the count is acceptable, though a bit sparse.
The domain appears to be model recommendation and comparison, and the tools cover listing, recommending, comparing, and explaining the logic. However, there is no tool to get details of a single model or to manage the catalog (add/update/delete), which are notable gaps for a complete surface.