gmail-read-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to gmail-read-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides read-only access to Gmail, enabling email search, unread listing, message and thread retrieval, and draft reply preparation without sending.530 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables reading, sending, archiving, and managing Gmail emails and labels through Google OAuth authentication, acting as an OAuth proxy to the Gmail API.530 npm12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching and reading Gmail messages, listing labels, and creating email drafts without sending or deleting emails.176 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables read-only Gmail access via MCP, allowing users to list and retrieve email messages with query and pagination support.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables authenticated Gmail access across several Google accounts at once, unifying them into a single mailbox view for searching, reading whole threads and attachments, and organizing messages with archive, read-state, spam, label and filter operations. Also composes and manages drafts and sends, replies, forwards mail only through an explicit send action, with opt-in safety policies and audit logging.14Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables programmatic interaction with Gmail using OAuth 2.0 authentication, allowing users to search, read, send, and manage emails through a standardized interface.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools, list_emails and read_email, have clearly distinct purposes—one for enumerating emails and the other for fetching full details of a specific email. There is no overlap or confusion possible.
Both tool names follow the consistent verb_noun pattern: 'list_emails' and 'read_email'. The naming is predictable and aligns with the server's read-only scope.
With only two tools, the server is minimal but well-suited for a read-only Gmail interface. While the count feels thin relative to typical multi-purpose servers, the narrow scope justifies the small surface.
For a read-only mail server, the two tools cover the core workflow: listing emails with metadata and reading a full email by ID. There are no apparent gaps that would impede an agent from retrieving email data.