F
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to programmatically create and manage use case diagrams (actors, use cases, subjects, relationships) in StarUML via a REST API.
1
-
Astah MCP
by g0mz
Related Servers
Alternatives to Astah MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI assistants to create, parse, render, and validate Draw.io diagrams programmatically.1492 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for rendering Object-Process Methodology (OPM) models from YAML to SVG diagrams and OPL sentences, with validation and generation capabilities.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables LLMs to create and edit draw.io diagrams using high-level intent commands, with automatic layout and styling.45 npm4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for AI assistants to programmatically create and manage Entity-Relationship Diagrams in StarUML, including full CRUD operations and PostgreSQL DDL generation.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server that lets AI agents drive StarUML programmatically — generate UML diagrams, execute commands, and manage elements and projects via HTTP.2139 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Most tools are clearly distinct, but 'create_astah_model' and 'create_meteorological_station_model' overlap in purpose; the latter appears to be a specialized version of the former, yet the descriptions don't clarify when to use one over the other. The remaining tools (verify, get, validate) are unambiguous.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (create_*, verify_*, get_*, validate_*). The naming is uniform and predictable, making it easy to infer tool behavior from the name alone.
Tool Count5/5
With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of creating, verifying, and validating Astah models. Each tool has a clear role, and the count is neither too thin nor excessively large.
Completeness4/5
The server covers the core lifecycle: creating models (generic and specific), validating layout, and checking environment. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit update/delete tools, but the generic creation tool likely handles most needs, and the verification workflow is well-supported.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues