Skip to main content
Glama
g-digital-by-Garrigues

GoCertius MCP Server

Official
by g-digital-by-Garrigues
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to GoCertius MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • c2pa-watermark-mcp

      CSOAI-ORG
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for embedding and verifying C2PA content credentials (provenance) in AI-generated assets, with HMAC-based tamper-evident manifests and optional X.509 support, helping comply with EU AI Act Article 50.
      MIT

    • eu-audit-mcp

      jellewas
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Tamper-evident audit trail MCP server for EU AI Act and GDPR compliance. It enables logging events with automatic PII scanning, compliance checks, and right-to-erasure support.
      Apache 2.0

    • attestix

      VibeTensor
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for compliance automation of AI agents, enabling EU AI Act compliance, verifiable credentials, and decentralized identity management with 47 tools across 9 modules.
      26
      Apache 2.0

    • moo-tasks

      shekarsiri
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for agentic task orchestration and management, enabling AI agents to create goals, plan tasks with acceptance criteria, track dependencies, request human input, and provide proof of completion.
      5 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 41 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a well-defined and distinct purpose within its domain (evidence, dossier, notification, chat, session). Even closely related tools like evidence_create and evidence_upload are clearly separated by use case. No ambiguity in tool selection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., evidence_create, dossier_list, notification_receiver_add). The naming is predictable and makes the tool's function immediately clear.

    Tool Count4/5

    41 tools is high for an MCP server, but the scope covers multiple complex domains (evidence, dossiers, notifications, chats) which justifies the number. Each tool earns its place, though some consolidation might be possible.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the entire certification workflow: case file management, evidence creation/upload/sealing, dossier creation/linking/certification, notifications, and certified chats. There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources