Skip to main content
Glama
EAD Enterprise Suite MCP Server

EAD Enterprise Suite MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to EAD Enterprise Suite MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and developers to create, send, and follow up on contracts for e-signature, manage signers and templates, retrieve signed PDFs and audit trails, and verify PDF signatures. It keeps signing and declining in the hands of each signer through personal links.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create e-signature contracts, issue signing URLs, check pending signature statuses, and verify document SHA-256 hashes and signature seals through natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to send documents for e-signature, track signing status, remind pending signers, and download signed PDFs with audit-trail hashes via the AddSign API.
      6
      49 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Lets AI agents send PDFs for e-signature (recognized under ESIGN and UETA), place fields, track signers, and pull an evidence package. Every signing event goes into a public hash chain, sealed daily, so anyone can verify a document without trusting the sender or the service. 100 documents a month free, no card.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage Zyta Sign documents, signatures, and studies with secure authentication and permission-respecting operations.
      49
      4 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 52 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., evidence_create vs evidence_upload, dossier_certify vs dossier_group_certify), but some overlap exists, like between notification_document_add (vague description) and other notification tools, and between large_evidence_upload_initiate and evidence_upload. The large number of tools may cause selection difficulty.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Pattern is mostly verb_noun (e.g., evidence_create, dossier_certify, signature_request_create), with a few deviations like notification_document_add (noun_noun_verb) and assign_validator_to_signatory (verb_noun_prep_noun). Overall consistent, but minor inconsistencies reduce the score.

    Tool Count3/5

    52 tools is high for most MCP servers, but the suite covers multiple domains (evidence, dossiers, notifications, signatures, sessions). Some tools could be consolidated (e.g., large_evidence_upload_initiate and evidence_upload). Feels slightly over-scoped but justified for enterprise use.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers full lifecycle for evidence, dossiers, notifications, and signatures, including advanced features like coordinate setting and validator assignment. Missing updates for evidence groups and a global notification list, but main workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive