MCP Weather Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_weatherD | – |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only a single tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is clear from its name: get_weather.
The only tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern (get_weather), which is consistent and predictable. There are no other tools to introduce naming conflicts.
A weather-focused server with only one tool feels too sparse. Typical weather servers offer current conditions, forecasts, and alerts, so the single get_weather tool is underdeveloped for the apparent scope.
The one tool provides only a generic weather lookup, missing likely needed operations such as forecasts, historical weather, or alerts. This represents a significant gap for a weather server's expected capabilities.