Skip to main content
Glama
fuzemobi

AiderMCP

by fuzemobi
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to AiderMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Aider MCP Server

      sengokudaikon
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that connects Claude and other MCP clients to Aider, enabling AI assistants to efficiently edit files, create new files, and interact with git repositories through natural language.
      40
      -

    • codex-mcp-server

      tuannvm
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Bridges Claude and OpenAI's Codex CLI for AI-powered code analysis, generation, and review, with support for session management, web search, and structured output.
      6
      836 npm
      629
      ISC

    • Codex MCP Server

      cexll
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants like Claude to the Codex CLI for code analysis, editing, and execution. Supports file references with @ syntax, sandboxed code execution with approval workflows, and structured code changes for automated refactoring and documentation.
      8
      172 npm
      179
      MIT

    • Session Buddy

      lesleslie
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive session management for Claude Code with automatic initialization/cleanup, quality checkpoints, and local conversation memory with semantic search for capturing learnings across coding sessions.
      6
      631 PyPI
      2
      BSD 3-Clause
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    improve_code overlaps significantly with add_feature and fix_bug, as it explicitly includes both fixing bugs and implementing features. This makes it unclear whether an agent should use the generic tool or the specific one. refactor is somewhat distinct but still a code-modification action, adding to the ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (improve_code, add_feature, fix_bug, get_status). The exception is 'refactor', a bare verb, which is a minor deviation but does not significantly harm predictability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of interfacing with Aider. Each tool maps to a distinct type of operation, and the count is neither too thin nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the main code-modification workflows (improve, add feature, fix bug, refactor) plus a status check. However, the generic improve_code makes the specific tools redundant, and there are no tools for reverting or committing changes, leaving minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources