Rimuovi dal carrello Amazon

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only mentions 'removes' without explaining side effects, whether the removal is permanent, or any authentication requirements. For a destructive/mutating action, this is insufficient disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that states the core action without unnecessary words. However, it is too sparse to fully inform the agent, though it is not verbose or redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a mutation, has no output schema, and only one parameter, the description is under-specified. It lacks details about return values, side effects, or when to use it, making it incomplete for an agent to invoke confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema describes the 'asin' parameter with a pattern, but schema description coverage is 0%. The description only says 'un ASIN' (an ASIN), adding no extra meaning beyond the parameter name. It does not compensate for the lack of coverage, so the parameter semantics remain largely unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool removes an ASIN from the cart ("Rimuove un ASIN dal carrello reale"), which is a specific verb+resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like amazon_update_quantity or amazon_get_cart, so it is not fully distinguishing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It lacks any context about conditions, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent without clear decision-making information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.