laya-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to laya-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides fast, offline typed decision tools (classify, score, check, triage) to agents via the Model Context Protocol, enabling safe local inference across 100+ languages with calibrated confidence and no text generation.821 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides agents with fast, typed, calibrated decision tools for classification, scoring, yes/no checks, and gating risky tool calls.5214 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes four System 1 decision tools — categorical choice, rubric scoring, binary probability assertions, and a pre-execution guardrail — over stdio JSON-RPC. This enables agents to make sub-second routing, triage, and safety decisions without slow generative calls.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to classify plain-language messages against runtime-defined intents, with margin-based doubt flags, beta yes/no checks, and per-intent probability scores, without training examples. It runs self-hosted and supports multilingual intent decisions in about 26 ms per message on a compiled GPU.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to make calibrated decisions via six MCP tools for classification, relevance ranking, claim verification, action gating, next-step control, and model listing, using Jev's System One model without generating text.625MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides coding agents with typed classification, yes/no checks, scoring, ranking, and question-answering tools that return calibrated probabilities for fast, reliable decisions.818 npm56MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but laya_route and route_step clearly overlap as routing tools, even though the descriptions try to differentiate them. laya_triage and laya_classify could also be confused in some contexts, though the batch-vs-single distinction helps.
Six tools follow a consistent laya_<verb> pattern, but route_step and verify_step break the convention by dropping the prefix and using verb_noun instead. The names are readable and meaningful, but the mixed style is noticeable.
Eight tools is within the ideal range and the set covers the major decision-engine capabilities. The main redundancy is the two routing tools, which slightly weakens the 'every tool earns its place' criterion but does not make the set bloated.
The tool surface covers the core decision, classification, routing, safety, verification, and health operations well. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool for refitting temperatures or managing the catalog, but these are not blocking for the primary inference and advisory workflows.