optimize_layout
Optimize the layout of an electronic circuit diagram to prevent overlapping text and component labels.
Instructions
回路図のレイアウトを最適化して文字の重複を防ぐ
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Optimize the layout of an electronic circuit diagram to prevent overlapping text and component labels.
回路図のレイアウトを最適化して文字の重複を防ぐ
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description mentions preventing character duplication but does not detail other behavioral aspects such as whether it is destructive or reversible, especially given no annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that conveys the essential purpose with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the tool has no parameters and simple purpose, the description lacks context on what exactly is optimized (e.g., whole circuit or selection) and any prerequisites, leaving some ambiguity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; the description does not need to add parameter information, and it effectively communicates the tool's action.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool optimizes layout to prevent character duplication, specifying a verb and resource that distinguishes it from sibling tools like add_component or connect_components.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, or any conditions under which it should not be used.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/fukayatti/schemdraw-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server