smaregi_server_info
Display the MCP server version and connection information to confirm server status and configuration.
Instructions
MCPサーバーのバージョンと接続先情報を表示します
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Display the MCP server version and connection information to confirm server status and configuration.
MCPサーバーのバージョンと接続先情報を表示します
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description indicates a read-only, non-destructive display of info, but does not mention auth requirements or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence conveys the entire purpose without redundancy. Perfectly concise and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-param info tool, the description is largely complete. Could be improved by noting whether authentication is required, but overall sufficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist (schema coverage 100%), so description does not need to add param info. Baseline 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool displays server version and connection info (verb+resource). It is distinct from sibling tools which perform API operations or auth/configuration.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. Usage is implied for checking server status before other operations, but alternatives are not discussed.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/fujioka0729/smaregi-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server