Skip to main content
Glama
fuhaooo

mcp-twitterio

by fuhaooo
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-twitterio

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • TwitterAPI.io MCP Server

      DevRico003
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents and coding assistants with Twitter data access including tweets, user profiles, followers, and search functionality.
      MIT

    • x-mcp-server

      MindMadeLab
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with X (Twitter) API v2 for posting tweets, searching, liking, retweeting, and more through natural language.
      MIT

    • Twitter MCP Server

      vinod827
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to interact with Twitter (X) for searching tweets, posting content with images, analyzing engagement, and extracting topics using the Twitter API.
      -

    • Twitter MCP Server

      kamflowersthemacrogod
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to access Twitter/X data including user profiles, tweets, search, and follower events via a set of MCP tools.
      1
      MIT

    • X MCP Server

      Lnxtanx
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to automate Twitter/X actions through the X API v2, supporting over 50 tools for posting, searching, user management, and more.
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct Twitter resource or action, making most boundaries clear. However, get_user_last_tweets and get_user_mentions could be confused without careful reading of descriptions, as both relate to user-centric tweets.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a get_<object>_<detail> pattern, but there are notable deviations like batch_get_users_by_ids, advanced_search_tweets, and get_list_tweets that disrupt consistency. The convention is readable but not uniformly applied.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the server is well-scoped for a read-only Twitter API client. Each tool covers a distinct operation, and the count is within the ideal range without feeling excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers a broad range of Twitter read operations: user info, tweets, interactions (replies, quotes, retweets), followers/followings, mentions, search, and list tweets. Minor gaps exist (e.g., user likes, trending topics), but core workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources