get_cde_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden, and it does well by noting 'passwords redacted' and specifying the exact environment variables and source file. It does not mention whether there are side effects, but the read-only nature is strongly implied by 'Return current configuration'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences with no wasted words. The main purpose is front-loaded, and the redaction note is included parenthetically for immediate awareness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter configuration getter, the description is complete: it states what it returns, what it reads, and the important security behavior (password redaction). No further context is needed to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so per the rubric the baseline is 4. The description adds value by listing the exact configuration keys that will be read, even though these are not function parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: 'Return current CDE/CDW configuration', clearly indicating this is a read-only retrieval tool. It distinguishes itself from sibling job-management tools by focusing on configuration rather than job operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly implies this is the tool to call when the agent needs the current CDE/CDW configuration, including source (environment or .env). It does not explicitly state when not to use it or name alternatives, but the context is clear enough given the sibling tools are about job lifecycle and diagnostics.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.