saij-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| saij_searchA | Search Argentine legal documents in SAIJ. |
| saij_get_documentA | Get a full document from SAIJ by its ID. |
| saij_get_sumariosA | Get all legal summaries (sumarios) linked to a court decision. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: saij_get_document retrieves a specific document by ID, saij_get_sumarios fetches summaries linked to a court decision, and saij_search performs broad queries across the legal database. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with the prefix 'saij_' and a clear verb_noun structure (get_document, get_sumarios, search). This uniformity aids predictability and readability across the tool set.
With 3 tools, the server is slightly lean but reasonable for its purpose of accessing Argentine legal documents. It covers key operations (retrieve, fetch related summaries, search), though a few more tools might enhance coverage without being necessary.
The tools provide good coverage for querying and retrieving legal documents, including metadata and summaries. Minor gaps exist, such as lacking explicit update or delete operations, but these are likely unnecessary for a read-only legal database, and agents can work effectively with the provided tools.