Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to overwing-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a single-purpose content-moderation gate that evaluates text and returns structured verdicts (spam/toxic probabilities, severity, confidence) with suggested actions (allow/review/block) for automated decision-making.
      1
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to score inline text or files for formulaic AI-writing patterns and receive rule-based diagnostics, violation context, and actionable advice via MCP tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to score their outgoing responses against groundedness and prompt-injection risks mid-turn, returning allow, warn, or block verdicts before the response reaches the user.
      9 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify claims against cited evidence, screen content for prompt injection and relevance before reading it, and rank candidates by meaning, all with calibrated probability verdicts.
      12
      5,273 npm
      574
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to obtain typed, probabilistic decisions from text or structured state and up to four images—choosing among labeled options, scoring on ordered scales, and estimating whether propositions are true—for routing, triage, moderation, risk scoring, and similar agent workflows.
      5
      49 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run local, deadline-aware format and PII checks before acting, with an optional safety classifier that runs only when suspicious text can be checked in time. It provides allow/redact/block verdicts plus status and load-simulation tools for MCP clients such as Claude Code and Cursor.
      5
      50 PyPI
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: single vs batch evaluation, rule set management, evaluation retrieval, and account/plan information. Even the plan-related tools (whoami, get_usage, list_plans) are cleanly separated by identity, usage, and catalog purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern: list_rule_sets, get_rule_set, create_rule_set, get_evaluation, list_evaluations. evaluate, evaluate_batch, and whoami are minor deviations but still verb-first and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well-scoped for an LLM evaluation service: two evaluation paths, three rule set operations, two evaluation lookup operations, and three account/plan tools. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The evaluation lifecycle is well covered: evaluate, retrieve, and list evaluations, plus list/get/create rule sets. Update and delete for rule sets are missing, which is a minor gap, but agents can work around it by creating new rule sets.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data