Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
crowdsec-ops-mcp

crowdsec-ops-mcp

by frli4797
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

suggest_scenario

Analyze repeated CrowdSec patterns to propose a scenario for automated response. Define a lookback window to refine detection and reduce alert fatigue.

Instructions

Suggest a CrowdSec scenario proposal from repeated CrowdSec patterns.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "suggest_scenario"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
windowNoLookback window such as 15m, 6h, 24h, 7d.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.2.1

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It only states it suggests a proposal, but does not disclose side effects, read-only nature, or output behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence with no redundancy, but slightly underspecified for completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and only one optional parameter, the description lacks information about what the output looks like or when this tool is most useful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'window', and description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool suggests a CrowdSec scenario proposal from repeated patterns, distinguishing it from sibling tools like recent_crowdsec_alerts or security_summary.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites or context for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools