get_releases

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds useful behavioral context beyond the schema by explaining that limit and offset apply to a 'preview' and that file_path saves the full list as JSON. However, with no annotations and no output schema, it does not disclose return structure, side effects of file writing, authentication, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the main purpose, followed by a compact parameter list. No unnecessary words or repetition. It could be slightly richer, but it is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and a large sibling set, the description misses key context such as the shape of returned data, how to distinguish this tool from get_release_series, and when the file_path option should be used. The preview/full-list distinction is helpful, but the overall operational context is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description compensates by explaining all three parameters: limit caps the preview, offset shifts the preview, and file_path optionally saves the full list. This adds meaning that the raw schema alone does not provide, though details like file overwrite behavior are absent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action and resource: 'Get all releases of economic data.' It is clear enough to identify the tool's primary function. However, it does not explicitly differentiate itself from the similar sibling get_release_series, so an agent may need to infer the distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_release_series or get_series_info. It only explains the parameters, with no mention of exclusions, prerequisites, or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.