delete_api_key
Remove a Resend API key using its unique ID. Required for revoking access or cleaning up unused keys.
Instructions
Delete a Resend API key by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| key_id | Yes | API key ID (from list_api_keys) |
Remove a Resend API key using its unique ID. Required for revoking access or cleaning up unused keys.
Delete a Resend API key by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| key_id | Yes | API key ID (from list_api_keys) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states the action without explaining consequences (e.g., irreversibility, cascading effects, required permissions). This is insufficient for a delete operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. However, it could be expanded to include key behavioral information without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a single-parameter delete tool with no output schema, the description is too minimal. It lacks details on success indicators or prerequisites beyond the param description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with key_id described, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Delete', the resource 'Resend API key', and the method 'by ID'. It is specific and distinguishes this tool from siblings like create_api_key or list_api_keys.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool or alternatives. Usage is implied from the action 'Delete', but no context on prerequisites or when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/friendlygeorge/resend-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server