Skip to main content
Glama
friendlygeorge

docker-mcp-server

Related Servers

Alternatives to docker-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage Docker containers through a secure MCP interface, supporting container lifecycle operations, log inspection, resource monitoring, and system diagnostics with role-based access control.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Docker containers, deploy stacks, and monitor services across multiple Docker hosts from one centralized location. Supports container lifecycle management, Docker Compose operations, and infrastructure orchestration through natural language commands.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to autonomously check, diagnose, and recover Dockerized services through safe, tool-based ops without direct host shell access.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Docker containers, images, networks, volumes, and Compose services through the Model Context Protocol. It supports system operations, command execution within containers, and integration with Docker Hub and GitHub Container Registry.
      79 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants like Claude to manage Docker containers, images, and Docker Compose deployments through the Model Context Protocol. Provides secure container lifecycle management, image operations, and multi-host Docker server connections.
      168 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct container/image/compose purposes, but the health and monitoring cluster is crowded: check_health, watch_health, container_health_status, container_stats, container_resource_usage, resource_alert_check, and monitor_dashboard all overlap in status/resource concerns. Descriptions help separate them, but an agent could still easily pick the wrong tool for a health or monitoring task.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Many tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern like list_containers, start_container, and pull_image. However, the monitoring/health group breaks this with noun-first names like container_stats, container_health_status, and container_resource_usage, and the compose tools use a different style like compose_up and compose_down.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 31 tools, this exceeds the 25-tool threshold for a well-scoped server. The count feels padded by overlapping health and monitoring tools that could reasonably be consolidated into fewer, more focused tools.

    Completeness3/5

    Container and image lifecycle coverage is strong, including run, inspect, start, stop, remove, build, pull, and compose operations. However, networks and volumes only have list operations with no create, update, or delete, and there are no prune, push, or tag operations, leaving notable gaps for a Docker management surface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessResponsive