get_views

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description is very brief (6 words). It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as what happens with invalid request IDs, read-only nature, or performance implications. The description carries the full burden but adds negligible transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with only one sentence of 6 words. Every word earns its place, and there is no redundancy or unnecessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (single parameter, no output schema), the description 'Get rendered views for a request' is reasonably complete. It doesn't explain what rendered views are, but the parameter schema covers the input, and the tool name is self-explanatory within the Clockwork context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'requestId', which is described as 'Clockwork request ID'. The tool description does not add any meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get rendered views for a request' uses a specific verb (Get) and resource (rendered views), clearly stating the action. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like get_http_requests or get_queries, slightly reducing distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives is provided. The description lacks any context about prerequisites, typical use cases, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.