Mindjack
Related Servers
Alternatives to Mindjack
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceOn-chain Solana cabal & rug detection as an MCP server. Scans any Solana token mint before your agent buys and returns an Exit-Liquidity Risk verdict.117 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceRug pull risk scores and on-chain forensics for memecoins on Solana, Ethereum, Base and Robinhood Chain - launch-bundle detection, funding-origin tracing, deployer history, insider networks and whale flow. 15 read-only tools.2315337 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceOn-chain Solana token safety for trading agents — traces coordinated wallet funding, same-block Jito bundles, serial-rug deployers and live coordinated dumps into one Exit-Liquidity Risk verdict before a swap. Free tier, then $0.02 USDC/query via x402.117 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for real-time Solana token risk analysis. Cross-references RugCheck.xyz, DexScreener, and GoPlus Security to generate three-layer reports: machine verdict → LLM analysis → raw on-chain evidence. Live on Solana mainnet with USDC micropayments ($0.02/audit). Give any AI agent the ability to check if a token is safe before trading.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSolana on-chain intelligence API — token scans, wallet PnL, bundle detection, fresh wallets, dev profiling. MCP server for Claude, Cursor & AI agents. Live PumpFun/Raydium streams1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceReal-time Solana token risk scoring, momentum signals, and graduation alerts via MCP. Free tier with 4 tools (no auth), PRO tier with 6 tools + batch analysis ($0.01/call via x402).61MIT
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Most tools have clearly differentiated roles, and descriptions cross-reference each other explicitly (verdict vs. holder counts vs. named wallets vs. graph; wallet history vs. network vs. KOL record). The main ambiguity comes from exact duplicate aliases like search/search_tokens and fetch/token_report, plus close neighbors like token_identity and token_web, though these are documented.
All names use snake_case and recognizable prefixes like token_, wallet_, kol_, find_, search_, and get_, so the set is readable and predictable. The pattern is weakened by object-first names like token_report and token_wallets sitting alongside verb-first names like check_token and find_tokens, and by the standalone aliases search and fetch.
26 tools is above the 25-tool threshold and the count is inflated by duplicate ChatGPT aliases plus many fine-grained variants covering closely related territory (inspect_token/token_wallets/token_graph, check_wallet/wallet_network/kol_record). A consolidated set of 15-18 tools would serve the same purpose with less surface area.
The tool surface covers the core token-intelligence workflow well: danger screening, holder and wallet forensics, exit viability, identity tracing, token discovery, KOL/funder tracking, and cohort analytics. Minor gaps exist—no dedicated live price/metadata call, no pre-analysis price history, and no general token-level transaction feed—but agents can work around them.