F
licenseC
qualityC
maintenanceEnables full control of Ableton Live from AI assistants, including transport, tracks, clips, devices, and scene management through 143 tools.
100
-
Ableton AI
by freekmurze
Related Servers
Alternatives to Ableton AI
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceBridges AI assistants with Ableton Live, enabling real-time control, offline project analysis, version tracking, and rack/preset parsing for music production workflows.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceControl Ableton Live using natural language via AI assistants like Claude or Cursor.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to control Ableton Live through natural language by querying tracks, analyzing sessions, and exporting stems via AbletonOSC integration.91MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to connect to Ableton Live, inspect the arrangement, compose and edit MIDI, manage tracks/scenes/clips, insert and tweak devices, and control the mixer.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects Ableton Live to AI assistants through Model Context Protocol (MCP), enabling natural language control of music production tasks like track creation, MIDI editing, instrument loading, and playback control.15MIT
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 157 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Several tools have overlapping purposes, notably quantize_clip and quantize_clip_notes which appear to do the same thing with different parameter names, and add_notes_to_clip versus add_notes_with_probability where the latter is a superset. While many tools are clearly distinct, the duplication and the sheer number of similar getters/setters (e.g., get_track_color vs get_track_info) make misselection a real risk.
Naming Consistency4/5
The vast majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern, with get_/set_/create_/delete_/duplicate_ dominating. Minor exceptions like health_check and tap_tempo are rare and do not undermine the overall predictability. The naming is largely coherent.
Tool Count2/5
At 157 tools, this is far beyond the recommended range and would overwhelm most agents. Many tools are overly granular—such as separate getters for track color, monitoring, and routing when get_track_info already returns detailed data—suggesting significant consolidation is possible. The count is excessive even for a complex DAW.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers the major lifecycle areas: tracks (create/delete/duplicate/group), clips (create/delete/notes/automation/warp), devices (get/set/move/delete), scenes, transport, browser, and session state. Minor gaps exist such as no direct move-track operation and no getter for clip start/end markers, but agents can generally work around these. Overall coverage is strong.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues