reboot_vm
Reboot a virtual machine on a specified Proxmox node by providing the node name and VM ID.
Instructions
Reboot a VM
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| node | Yes | The node name | |
| vmid | Yes | The VM ID |
Reboot a virtual machine on a specified Proxmox node by providing the node name and VM ID.
Reboot a VM
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| node | Yes | The node name | |
| vmid | Yes | The VM ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations provide destructiveHint=false, indicating safety. Description adds no extra behavioral context (e.g., graceful reboot, timeout, or impact on running processes). Burden is on annotations, which are minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (4 words), no unnecessary text. However, lacks structure (e.g., bullet points) and could benefit from a brief note on usage.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (2 required params, no output schema, no nested objects), the description is too minimal. It omits context like whether the VM must exist, if it's a soft or hard reboot, and what the return value is.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. Description adds no additional meaning or constraints beyond what schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Reboot a VM' clearly states the verb and resource, but does not differentiate from similar siblings like 'reset_vm' or 'shutdown_vm'. It is clear but lacking sibling distinction.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use reboot vs alternatives like shutdown/stop/reset. No mention of prerequisites (e.g., VM must be running) or after-effects.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/fredriksknese/mcp-proxmox'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server