mcp-openmediavault
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-openmediavault
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI assistants manage an OpenMediaVault NAS over SSH using OMV's own RPC interface, covering disks, filesystems, shares, users, S.M.A.R.T. health, services, and configuration changes. It exposes a small set of generic tools to discover and call RPC methods, plus optional shell access.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides read-only server monitoring and diagnostic tools for AI assistants to manage Linux and Unraid systems via SSH. It enables natural language interactions for container management, storage health checks, and system log analysis while keeping credentials secure.17ISC
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read-only monitor iStoreOS/OpenWRT routers via SSH or HTTP/ubus API, providing 31 tools for system status, network info, logs, and plugin status (OpenClash, Passwall, AdGuardHome, etc.).31MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceExposes tools to manage and inspect an OpenMediaVault NAS, running on the NAS and communicating over SSH with any MCP-capable coding harness.48MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLets an LLM client monitor devices, services, disk usage, and uptime in a home network and home lab.-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to monitor and control server hardware (power, thermal, storage, firmware, event logs) via Redfish BMC API on Dell iDRAC, HPE iLO, Lenovo XCC, Supermicro BMC, and others.173-
TDQS
Scored across 39 tools
Most tools target distinct resources (disks, users, shares, services), but some overlap exists between 'enumerate_' and 'list_' variants (e.g., enumerate_groups vs list_groups). Descriptions clarify differences, so ambiguity is minor.
Tool names mix 'get_', 'list_', and 'enumerate_' prefixes with no strict pattern. For example, 'get_system_info' uses 'get' while 'list_disks' uses 'list'. Some tools use 'get_xxx_settings' vs 'get_xxx_info'. The pattern is inconsistent but still readable.
39 tools is slightly high for a single server, but the domain of NAS management involves many read-only queries. Each tool serves a specific sub-resource, so the count is justified, though it could be reduced by combining some settings endpoints.
The server only provides read operations; there are no create, update, or delete tools for any resource. This is a major gap for management tasks like adding users, configuring shares, or enabling services. The surface is severely incomplete for its apparent purpose.