Skip to main content
Glama
fredriksknese

mcp-openmediavault

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-openmediavault

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets AI assistants manage an OpenMediaVault NAS over SSH using OMV's own RPC interface, covering disks, filesystems, shares, users, S.M.A.R.T. health, services, and configuration changes. It exposes a small set of generic tools to discover and call RPC methods, plus optional shell access.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides read-only server monitoring and diagnostic tools for AI assistants to manage Linux and Unraid systems via SSH. It enables natural language interactions for container management, storage health checks, and system log analysis while keeping credentials secure.
      17
      ISC
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read-only monitor iStoreOS/OpenWRT routers via SSH or HTTP/ubus API, providing 31 tools for system status, network info, logs, and plugin status (OpenClash, Passwall, AdGuardHome, etc.).
      31
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes tools to manage and inspect an OpenMediaVault NAS, running on the NAS and communicating over SSH with any MCP-capable coding harness.
      48
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to monitor and control server hardware (power, thermal, storage, firmware, event logs) via Redfish BMC API on Dell iDRAC, HPE iLO, Lenovo XCC, Supermicro BMC, and others.
      17
      3
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 39 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources (disks, users, shares, services), but some overlap exists between 'enumerate_' and 'list_' variants (e.g., enumerate_groups vs list_groups). Descriptions clarify differences, so ambiguity is minor.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names mix 'get_', 'list_', and 'enumerate_' prefixes with no strict pattern. For example, 'get_system_info' uses 'get' while 'list_disks' uses 'list'. Some tools use 'get_xxx_settings' vs 'get_xxx_info'. The pattern is inconsistent but still readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    39 tools is slightly high for a single server, but the domain of NAS management involves many read-only queries. Each tool serves a specific sub-resource, so the count is justified, though it could be reduced by combining some settings endpoints.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only provides read operations; there are no create, update, or delete tools for any resource. This is a major gap for management tasks like adding users, configuring shares, or enabling services. The surface is severely incomplete for its apparent purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues