Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-cohesity

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely access and manage Commvault environments, including job control, backup schedules, client/storage management, SLA monitoring, and optional DocuSign envelope backup integration.
      17
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager and NetWorker backup infrastructure as Claude Code tools for querying, monitoring, and controlling backup operations.
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Dell PowerScale (Isilon) OneFS clusters through over 2,400 tools generated from the REST API specification. It supports managing storage protocols, snapshots, networking, and cluster configurations using natural language.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Nutanix infrastructure via Prism Central and Prism Element APIs, including VM operations, cluster management, networking, and as-built report generation.
      28
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to read and control Veeam Backup & Replication infrastructure through natural language, supporting full operator capabilities like starting/stopping jobs, creating backups, and monitoring threat detection via the VBR REST API.
      34
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with and manage Kubernetes clusters, supporting operations on pods, deployments, services, configmaps, secrets, namespaces, metrics, and events with built-in safety features for destructive actions.
      9
      13 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct entity and action (e.g., get_cluster_info vs get_cluster_stats, list_protection_groups vs list_protection_policies), with no overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, such as get_cluster_info, list_alerts, run_protection_group, resolve_alert.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools cover the typical operations for a data protection domain without being excessive or insufficient, balancing detail and scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The set lacks create/update/delete operations for protection groups and policies, which are common lifecycle actions; agents may need those for full management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues