Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to IteraTools MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Production-ready MCP server for AI agents — web search, content extraction, screenshots, weather, finance, email validation, translation, and IP geolocation.
      11 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Multi-tool MCP server for AI agents with 29 tools across web scraping, SEO analysis, screenshot and PDF generation, domain intelligence, content extraction, multi-chain EVM blockchain queries, and security toolkit. Free tier available with no auth required.
      39 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server providing 15 web tools including search, scraping, screenshots, SEO audits, and DNS/SSL checks through a single installation. It delivers clean, LLM-optimized outputs so AI agents can focus on reasoning rather than parsing raw HTML.
      15
      27 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server providing 8 tools for file operations, shell command execution, web search and fetching, plus AI-powered code review and text summarization, with built-in security controls.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A unified MCP server providing AI agents with 40+ developer APIs including geolocation, crypto prices, DNS lookup, and web scraping. Enables natural language access to various tools through a single gateway.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting different domains like audio, images, PDFs, web, and utilities, with clear boundaries. However, there is some overlap between image_fast and image_generate (both generate images with different models/speeds) and between scrape and browser_act (both involve web extraction), which could cause minor confusion for agents.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern throughout, with clear verb_noun or noun_verb structures (e.g., audio_transcribe, browser_act, chart_generate). There are no deviations in style or convention, making them predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 25 tools, the count is borderline high for a general-purpose utility server, as it covers many disparate domains (e.g., audio, images, web, crypto, weather). While each tool seems functional, the scope feels broad, potentially making the set feel heavy or unfocused compared to more specialized servers.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a wide range of common utility tasks across multiple domains, with no obvious major gaps for the stated purpose of general automation and processing. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool for editing images beyond resizing/background removal or no tool for summarizing text, but agents can likely work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues