A
licenseC
qualityF
maintenanceWord document reading and writing MCP implemented in Node.js
7
102 npm
11
MIT
Office Word MCP Server
by franlealp1
Related Servers
Alternatives to Office Word MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables creation, editing, and management of Word documents through JSON schema with support for rich content including text formatting, tables, images, code blocks, and lists. Provides comprehensive DOCX operations including opening existing documents, modifying content, and saving files to disk.1228 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA powerful Word document processing service based on FastMCP, enabling AI assistants to create, edit, and manage docx files with full formatting support. Preserves original styles when editing content.191-
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to create, read, edit, and format Microsoft Word documents through standardized tools and resources.5417,843 PyPI2,110MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered querying and management of documentation through markdown file serving, keyword search, and OpenAI-based Q\&A capabilities. Supports document indexing, analysis, and agent handoffs with rate limiting protection.5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides comprehensive document processing, including reading, converting, and manipulating various document formats with advanced text and HTML processing capabilities.16186 npm19MIT
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 32 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap that could cause confusion. For example, 'add_paragraph' and 'insert_line_or_paragraph_near_text' both handle paragraph insertion, and 'find_text_in_document' and 'search_and_replace' both involve text searching. The descriptions help clarify differences, but an agent might misselect between similar tools.
Naming Consistency4/5
The naming is mostly consistent with a verb_noun pattern, such as 'add_paragraph', 'format_text', and 'create_document'. However, there are minor deviations like 'list_available_documents' (which fits) and 'replace_block_between_manual_anchors' (which is verbose but follows the pattern). No chaotic mixing of styles is present.
Tool Count2/5
With 32 tools, this server feels overly heavy for a Word document manipulation scope. While Word has many features, the tool set includes numerous specialized operations that could be consolidated or omitted, leading to potential complexity and confusion for agents. A more streamlined set of 15-20 tools would be more appropriate.
Completeness5/5
The tool surface is highly complete for Word document operations, covering creation, editing, formatting, conversion, protection, and metadata handling. It includes CRUD-like actions for paragraphs, tables, and styles, as well as advanced features like footnotes, headers, and XML access. No obvious gaps are present for the domain.