Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to qwen-web-research-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for local semantic search over web content, enabling AI agents to ingest, index, and query pages with hybrid retrieval and token budget control.
      4
      GPL 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Semantic web search MCP server that navigates the live web using a cheap LLM and local embeddings, caching results for fast responses to similar queries without relying on general search engines.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for multi-engine web search and web page fetching, supporting parallel search, content extraction, and optional LLM-powered search summarization and deep search.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for web search and page extraction, providing clean markdown from URLs, search results, site mapping, and research endpoints without API keys or accounts.
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-contained web-research MCP server that lets local LLM agents search, fetch, and synthesize web content using tools like web_search, web_fetch, and web_research.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for private web search via self-hosted SearXNG with local reranking, full-page content fetching via Firecrawl, and optional Ollama-powered query expansion and summaries.
      7
      109 npm
      24
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two analysis tools are cleanly separated by input: analyze_page targets one explicit URL, while search_site_and_analyze first discovers matching pages on a domain and then analyzes them. list_available_models is clearly a separate utility, so there is no real ambiguity between tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case and lead with a verb, making the set predictable and readable. The main deviation is that search_site_and_analyze combines two actions into one name, while the other tools use a simpler verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is small but defensible for a focused web-research helper: two research workflows plus a model discovery utility. It is slightly minimal, but there is no obvious bloat or unnecessary duplication.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers single-page analysis and site-scoped search, which are useful core pieces. However, it lacks a general web-search flow or multi-site research capability, so open-ended web research requests would have no obvious tool to use.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues