okx_generate_trading_plan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the dependency on okx_run_copilot but does not clarify whether this tool executes orders, mutates state, or has other side effects. Given the phrase 'executable trading plan,' this omission is significant.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the primary action, and every sentence adds necessary context. There is no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema and no annotations. The description explains the prerequisite but does not describe return values, side effects, or how the optional instrument parameter should be used. For a tool with nested objects and a required input, these gaps leave the agent under-informed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The coPilotResult parameter is described in the schema as 'Result from okx_run_copilot,' and the description reinforces that. However, the optional instrument parameter lacks description and the description does not add meaningful details beyond what the schema already provides. With 50% schema coverage, this is adequate but not compensatory.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it generates a detailed executable trading plan from a co-pilot analysis result, using a specific verb and resource. It is easily distinguished from siblings like okx_run_copilot and okx_place_order.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly instructs to run okx_run_copilot first and then pass the analysis result, providing clear usage context and a prerequisite. It does not mention alternatives or when not to use this tool, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.