Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to marker-watch-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local STDIO MCP server for running one bounded command and waiting for its final result, eliminating model-driven polling. Designed for builds, test suites, and other trusted foreground commands.
      3
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight build daemon that exposes project build flows as MCP tools, enabling AI assistants to drive builds, check status, and react to results.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for running long-running processes in PTY with real-time output streaming, enabling interactive dev servers, watch modes, and CLI tools.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables management of long-running development processes (such as dev servers, compilers, and watchers) from MCP hosts. Provides tools to start, stop, restart, check status, view logs, and send input to managed processes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides tools for executing shell commands both synchronously and asynchronously with real-time output streaming and process management capabilities. It enables users to start background tasks, monitor progress, and manage long-running processes via Stdio or HTTP transports.
      261 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: status, specific version result, blocking wait, non-blocking wait state, and debug output. The only mild ambiguity is between get_build_status, get_build_wait, and await_build, which all involve build state/results and require reading descriptions carefully.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tool names consistently use snake_case and mostly follow a get_/await_/start_ verb pattern. The compound debug_get_live_output deviates slightly, and the repeated get_build_* prefix creates some similarity, but overall the naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is a well-scoped size for a build-monitoring server. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of querying or waiting for build results without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the key workflows: checking overall status, fetching a specific build result, waiting for the next completed build, starting a non-blocking wait, polling that wait, and debugging unresponsive builds. No critical missing operation is apparent for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues