heddle
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to heddle
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for temporal state queries and cryptographic audit trails. Query historical entity state at any point in time, generate Merkle proofs of past state, and anchor contract snapshots for immutable provenance.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for code and UI safety: provides blast-radius analysis, breaking-change detection, headless UI capture and diffing, and checkpoint/rollback for workspaces.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that acts as a temporal verification firewall, checking structured assumptions or diffs against immutable version receipts to return allow/block/abstain with cited evidence.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAI code impact analysis MCP server that monitors file changes, maps dependency graphs, detects cascading breakage, and gates builds before damage spreads.53 npm2Elastic 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the governed knowledge layer, enabling agents to query canonical entries, retrieve conflicts, and manage proposals with strict tenant isolation and audit.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that helps software teams track and understand technical debt, recurring issues, project dependencies, and real-time agent handoffs through a causal knowledge graph.2 npm1Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
The tool set contains exact duplicates (e.g., changed and heddle_change_list, churn and heddle_entity_churn_count_get, etc.) with identical descriptions, making it impossible for an agent to distinguish between them. This severe overlap undermines any ability to reliably select the correct tool.
Naming is chaotic: half the tools use short names (blast_radius, changed, churn, reverify, timeline) while the other half use a 'heddle_' prefix with different patterns (heddle_change_list, heddle_edge_snapshot_capture, etc.). Verbs are mixed (capture, changed, get) and no consistent verb_noun pattern is followed.
The raw count of 12 tools is within a reasonable range, but half are duplicates, effectively reducing the unique tool count to 6. While not extreme, the duplication suggests poor scoping and undermines efficiency.
The set covers core operations like capturing snapshots, listing changes, getting churn/timeline/impact radius, but lacks update/delete or other lifecycle operations. The duplicates do not add new functionality, so coverage is adequate but not comprehensive.