Skip to main content
Glama
fortunto2

Prefect MCP Server

by fortunto2

get_deployment_by_id

Retrieve a specific deployment by its unique ID to view configuration details and status within Prefect workflow automation.

Instructions

Get a deployment by its ID.

Args:
    deployment_id: ID of the deployment to retrieve.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
deployment_idYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function implementing the 'get_deployment_by_id' tool logic. It fetches the deployment using Prefect's client.read_deployment and handles errors. Registered directly via the @mcp.tool() decorator.
    @mcp.tool()
    async def get_deployment_by_id(ctx: Context, deployment_id: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Get a deployment by its ID.
    
        Args:
            deployment_id: ID of the deployment to retrieve.
        """
        if not deployment_id:
            return {"error": "Missing required argument: deployment_id"}
    
        async with get_client() as client:
            try:
                deployment = await client.read_deployment(UUID(deployment_id))
                return {"deployment": deployment.model_dump()}
            except Exception as e:
                return {"error": f"Failed to get deployment: {str(e)}"}
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states it 'retrieves' a deployment, implying a read-only operation, but doesn't clarify authentication requirements, rate limits, error conditions, or what happens if the ID doesn't exist. For a retrieval tool with zero annotation coverage, this leaves significant behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized with two sentences: a clear purpose statement followed by parameter documentation. The 'Args:' section is front-loaded and efficient. There's no wasted text, though the structure could be slightly improved by integrating the parameter explanation more seamlessly rather than as a separate labeled section.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given this is a simple retrieval tool with one parameter and an output schema exists (so return values are documented elsewhere), the description is reasonably complete. It covers the core purpose and parameter meaning. The main gaps are behavioral context (no annotations) and usage guidance relative to siblings, but for a straightforward lookup operation, it provides sufficient context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaningful context for the single parameter: 'deployment_id: ID of the deployment to retrieve.' With 0% schema description coverage (the schema only provides title 'Deployment Id' and type 'string'), this description compensates well by explaining what the parameter represents. For a single parameter tool, this provides adequate semantic understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose with 'Get a deployment by its ID' - a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('deployment') with a clear identifier mechanism ('by its ID'). It distinguishes from siblings like 'get_deployment_by_name' by specifying the lookup method, but doesn't explicitly contrast with 'filter_deployments' or 'list_deployments' which serve different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention when to choose this over 'get_deployment_by_name', 'filter_deployments', or 'list_deployments', nor does it specify prerequisites or appropriate contexts for use. The agent must infer usage from the tool name and sibling names alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/fortunto2/prefect-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server