OmniFocus MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to OmniFocus MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read and write to OmniFocus database, allowing natural language task management, project creation, and GTD workflows.41MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceGives MCP-compatible AI assistants full, typed access to OmniFocus on macOS, enabling task management, project manipulation, inbox processing, and more via natural language.10017 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI-powered task management in OmniFocus with support for project reviews, planned dates, repeating tasks, custom perspectives, hierarchical subtasks, and advanced filtering. Perfect for Claude AI integration with comprehensive CRUD operations for tasks, projects, and folders.2-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive management of OmniFocus on macOS through 17 specialized tools for projects, tasks, and organization. Users can create, update, and filter items or navigate the interface using natural language via the Model Context Protocol.218MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables Codex to interact with the user's local OmniFocus database on macOS, allowing task management, project creation, and tag operations through natural language.21MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for AI assistants to query and manage OmniFocus tasks, projects, and tags on macOS.11MIT
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Most query/add/manage tools have distinct scopes, but there is real overlap: edit_item can move items like move_items, add_task/add_items/create_project_from_outline all create items, and remove_items/manage_folder both delete folders. Descriptions help, but an agent could still pick the wrong tool in several cases.
The snake_case verb_noun pattern is largely consistent with query_*, add_*, and manage_* groups. Minor deviations like omnifocus_status, omnifocus_session, and the longer create_project_from_outline keep it from being perfectly uniform.
25 tools sits at the heavy end of the range for a single server. It is comprehensive for OmniFocus, but some overlapping creation/deletion paths and utility tools make the set feel larger than strictly necessary.
The surface covers task/project/folder/tag/notification lifecycles, repetition, review, undo, and status checks. The main gaps are attachment creation and perspective creation/deletion, which are largely platform limitations, so core workflows are still supported.