typescript-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to typescript-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA boilerplate project for quickly developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using TypeScript, with example tools (calculator, greet) and resources (server info) pre-implemented.52 npm-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA boilerplate project for quickly developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using TypeScript SDK, with example tools (calculator, greetings) and resources (server info) to get started.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA boilerplate project for quickly developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using TypeScript SDK, with example implementations of tools (calculator, greeting) and resources (server info).8 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA boilerplate project for quickly developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using TypeScript SDK, with example implementations of tools (calculator, greeting) and resources (server info).-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA boilerplate project for quickly developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using TypeScript SDK, with example implementations of tools (calculator, greeting) and resources (server info).291 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA boilerplate project for quickly developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using TypeScript SDK, with example implementations of tools (calculator, greeting) and resources (server info).-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool performs a completely distinct function with no functional overlap: geocoding, weather, image generation, greeting, arithmetic, and time retrieval. An agent can easily select the correct tool based on the task.
Tool names are all lowercase and use hyphens for multi-word names, but there is a mix of single verbs (geocode, greet, calc, time) and verb-noun compounds (get-weather, generate-image). The pattern is mostly consistent but not uniform.
With 6 tools, the count is well within the ideal range for a general-purpose utility server. Each tool serves a unique, practical purpose, and the set is neither bloated nor too thin.
The tools are self-contained and each fully covers its individual function. Since the server appears to be a general utility/demo toolkit with no specific domain, there are no obvious gaps in lifecycle or CRUD operations, though the set lacks a unifying theme.