Skip to main content
Glama
formfeed-dev

formfeed

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to formfeed

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables PDF and image generation from templates, JSON, HTML, or URLs through the PDF Gen Studio API. Supports rendering, template management, and multiple output formats.
      6 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables creating professional documents (invoices, contracts, certificates, proposals, reports) via the DocuQueue API, with tools for template management, filling, previewing, and PDF generation.
      70 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Office documents — create, edit, fill templates, convert, and extract Word/Excel/PowerPoint. LaTeX-style markup, math formulas, PDF export, template loops, and document diff. stdio / SSE / Streamable HTTP with auth and rate limiting.
      12
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a clearly distinct operation (listing, reading source, reading schema, saving, validating, rendering, converting, checking status, validating invoices, workspace info), and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other (e.g. render vs convert_to_pdf, validate_template vs render). The remaining soft overlaps are get_template_schema vs get_template_source (both 'read about a template') and validate_template vs check_invoice (both 'validate'), but the descriptions disambiguate them well enough to avoid misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_template_source, get_template_schema, get_render, get_workspace, list_templates, save_template, validate_template, convert_to_pdf, check_invoice. The lone deviation is `render`, a bare verb with no object, which slightly breaks the pattern but is unambiguous in context.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the sweet spot and each earns its place: discovery, schema, source, edit, validation, render, conversion, polling, e-invoice check, and workspace context. Nothing feels padded or redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: list/read/schema/save-draft/validate/render/convert/poll, with a deliberate human publish step and invoice validation for e-invoicing. Gaps exist around template housekeeping (no archive/delete, no list of versions or past renders beyond a single id), but agents can work around these via the review_url and Formfeed UI.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues