Memos MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Memos MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Memos instances for knowledge management. Supports searching, creating, updating, and retrieving memos with markdown content, tags, and visibility controls.45MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Memos instances for personal note-taking and knowledge management. Supports creating, searching, updating, and organizing memos with tags, dates, and visibility settings through natural language.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables to interact with Memos note-taking service, allowing search, creation, retrieval, and updating of notes through natural language.45 npm4-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read and write Memos notes through a Personal Access Token, with task-oriented search, precise editing, todo and tag management, attachment handling, exports, prompts, and resources. It supports both local stdio and multi-user Streamable HTTP transports, with safety switches such as read-only mode and restricted file access.209 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to create, read, update, delete, and list memos via the MCP protocol.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI clients to manage a self-hosted Memos instance, providing tools for memos, attachments, comments, reactions, shares, and user metadata, with optional OAuth for remote access.10 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: instance management, memo CRUD, tags, shortcuts, and attachments are clearly separated. Even the list_* tools are unambiguous because the resource type is explicit in each name.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern, such as list_memos, create_memo, update_shortcut, and upload_attachment. The only slight deviation is get_memo instead of list_memo, but this is still consistent with standard CRUD naming.
With 16 tools, the set is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range but still well-scoped for a server covering instances, memos, tags, shortcuts, and attachments. Each tool covers a needed operation, so the count feels justified rather than bloated.
Core memo lifecycle, instance management, shortcut CRUD, and attachment operations are well covered. Minor gaps exist, such as no attachment download/retrieval endpoint and no single get_shortcut operation, but agents can mostly work around these using list operations.