Skip to main content
Glama
flyfei-cmd

CodeQL LSP MCP Server

by flyfei-cmd

Related Servers

Alternatives to CodeQL LSP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Wraps the CodeQL Language Server Protocol to enable LLM agents to write CodeQL queries with intelligent code completion, hover information, and other language features.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI coding agents to retrieve real-time language-server diagnostics, type and symbol information, definitions, references, workspace-wide renames, and file operations from an open editor. This provides accurate code navigation and editing context without waiting for slow tsc or eslint checks.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query language intelligence over MCP, including definitions, references, symbols, and code relationship graphs across many languages, all in one native process with no external language servers.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to leverage VS Code's language intelligence for code navigation, refactoring, and analysis via the MCP protocol.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides any MCP-capable coding agent with shared, warm language-server intelligence and project-local configuration, so diagnostics, definitions, references, hover, symbols, code actions, formatting, rename, and sync behave consistently across harnesses and sessions. This lets users switch agent tools without reconfiguring LSP integrations or falling back to CLI verification.
      2 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides IDE-like coding capabilities for AI agents via MCP, enabling semantic code retrieval, symbol-level editing, refactoring, and navigation across many programming languages.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a distinct LSP feature: completion, hover, definition, references, diagnostics, formatting, and file updates. There is no overlap or ambiguity between the tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent codeql_ prefix followed by a clear, lower_snake_case feature name. This uniform namespace makes the toolset predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is a well-scoped number for a language server adapter. Each tool covers a common editor interaction, and there is no bloat or unnecessary overlap.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers core LSP features (completion, hover, definitions, references, diagnostics, formatting, and content updates) but omits some common capabilities like rename or document symbols. These gaps are minor and agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues