Skip to main content
Glama
flyfei-cmd

CodeQL LSP MCP Server

by flyfei-cmd

Related Servers

Alternatives to CodeQL LSP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Wraps the CodeQL Language Server Protocol to enable LLM agents to write CodeQL queries with intelligent code completion, hover information, and other language features.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query language intelligence over MCP, including definitions, references, symbols, and code relationship graphs across many languages, all in one native process with no external language servers.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to leverage VS Code's language intelligence for code navigation, refactoring, and analysis via the MCP protocol.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides IDE-like coding capabilities for AI agents via MCP, enabling semantic code retrieval, symbol-level editing, refactoring, and navigation across many programming languages.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to perform local code search, indexing, and analysis across Java, JavaScript/TypeScript, .NET/C#, and Python projects through the MCP protocol.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with VS Code's language server protocol features (definitions, references, diagnostics) and debugger (breakpoints, stepping, variable inspection) via an MCP server.
      6 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a distinct LSP feature: completion, hover, definition, references, diagnostics, formatting, and file updates. There is no overlap or ambiguity between the tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent codeql_ prefix followed by a clear, lower_snake_case feature name. This uniform namespace makes the toolset predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is a well-scoped number for a language server adapter. Each tool covers a common editor interaction, and there is no bloat or unnecessary overlap.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers core LSP features (completion, hover, definitions, references, diagnostics, formatting, and content updates) but omits some common capabilities like rename or document symbols. These gaps are minor and agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues