CodeQL LSP MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to CodeQL LSP MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceWraps the CodeQL Language Server Protocol to enable LLM agents to write CodeQL queries with intelligent code completion, hover information, and other language features.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query language intelligence over MCP, including definitions, references, symbols, and code relationship graphs across many languages, all in one native process with no external language servers.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to leverage VS Code's language intelligence for code navigation, refactoring, and analysis via the MCP protocol.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides IDE-like coding capabilities for AI agents via MCP, enabling semantic code retrieval, symbol-level editing, refactoring, and navigation across many programming languages.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients to perform local code search, indexing, and analysis across Java, JavaScript/TypeScript, .NET/C#, and Python projects through the MCP protocol.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with VS Code's language server protocol features (definitions, references, diagnostics) and debugger (breakpoints, stepping, variable inspection) via an MCP server.6 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool serves a distinct LSP feature: completion, hover, definition, references, diagnostics, formatting, and file updates. There is no overlap or ambiguity between the tools.
All tools follow a consistent codeql_ prefix followed by a clear, lower_snake_case feature name. This uniform namespace makes the toolset predictable and easy to navigate.
Seven tools is a well-scoped number for a language server adapter. Each tool covers a common editor interaction, and there is no bloat or unnecessary overlap.
The toolset covers core LSP features (completion, hover, definitions, references, diagnostics, formatting, and content updates) but omits some common capabilities like rename or document symbols. These gaps are minor and agents can work around them.