gmail-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to gmail-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables simultaneous management of multiple Gmail accounts through MCP, allowing per-account reads and writes with verified labels and parallel search across all mailboxes.12 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables interacting with multiple Gmail accounts through a single MCP server, supporting search, labels, drafts, and thread management with per-account OAuth.1-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables multi-account access to Gmail, Google Calendar, Docs, Sheets, and Drive over local stdio or authenticated HTTPS, including read operations and explicitly gated write operations for email, calendar, documents, and spreadsheets.2432 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables managing multiple Gmail accounts through a single MCP server, with independent OAuth per account, supporting email read, search, labeling, drafting and sending, as well as calendar and iCal feed operations.41Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching, reading, and drafting emails across multiple Gmail accounts through a single MCP server.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceConnect multiple Gmail accounts to any MCP client, enabling search, read, draft, send, label, and organize mail across unlimited accounts with local-only OAuth token storage.2212 npm8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Every tool targets a distinct action-resource pair: account management, search/read, send/reply/draft, labels, and trash are cleanly separated. Even similar tools like get_message and get_thread are clearly scoped by resource type, and list_labels explicitly feeds modify_labels without overlap.
All tools use the consistent gmail_verb_noun pattern with snake_case, making the action and target predictable. Minor variation like reply_to_thread instead of reply_thread does not break the overall convention.
Twelve tools is well-scoped for a Gmail server: account lifecycle, search/read, send/reply/draft, labels, and trash each get focused coverage without redundancy. The count is solidly within the ideal range.
Core Gmail workflows are well covered: search, read, send, reply, draft, label modification, trash, and multi-account management. Minor gaps exist—no attachment content download, no draft editing/deletion, and no label create/delete—but these are workable and do not leave the main workflows dead-ended.