Ideogram MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDEOGRAM_API_KEY | Yes | Your Ideogram API key |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
| prompts | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| download_imagesD | – |
| generateD | – |
| editD | – |
| describeD | – |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| generate_image |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Tool names are distinct (describe, download_images, edit, generate) but without descriptions, an agent cannot reliably determine their boundaries. For example, 'describe' might overlap with 'generate' if generating a description, leading to potential misselection.
Naming is inconsistent: 'describe', 'edit', and 'generate' are single verbs, while 'download_images' uses a verb_noun pattern with an underscore. No consistent verb_noun or camelCase pattern is followed.
4 tools is within the typical well-scoped range (3-15), but for an image generation server, the set feels slightly thin. Still, each tool appears to serve a distinct purpose without being excessive.
The tools cover basic operations: generate, edit, describe, and download images. However, obvious gaps exist, such as missing list, delete, or style-transfer tools, which may cause agent failures in common workflows.