redmine_list_files
List files for a specific Redmine project by providing the project ID or identifier.
Instructions
List files for a specific project
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | Yes | Project ID or identifier |
List files for a specific Redmine project by providing the project ID or identifier.
List files for a specific project
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | Yes | Project ID or identifier |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits like what is returned, pagination, or permissions. It only states the basic function, leaving many unknowns.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no waste, though it could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool lacks output schema and annotations, and the description does not compensate by detailing return values or limitations, leaving it incomplete for effective use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the parameter 'project_id' is already described in the schema. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('list') and resource ('files') for a specific project, distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'redmine_upload_file' or 'redmine_get_attachment'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any context about prerequisites or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/flor3z-github/redmine-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server