get_adset
Retrieve a single ad set's details by ID, with optional field selection. Get targeted ad set information directly from Meta Ads.
Instructions
Fetch a single ad set by id
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Retrieve a single ad set's details by ID, with optional field selection. Get targeted ad set information directly from Meta Ads.
Fetch a single ad set by id
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only restates the core action ('fetch') without disclosing response format, error behavior, or the effect of the optional 'fields' parameter. This is too minimal to be behaviorally transparent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. Every word adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has two parameters and no output schema, the description is too brief. It fails to explain the 'fields' parameter or any return/error behavior, leaving the agent with incomplete information for correct invocation and interpretation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The phrase 'by id' explains the purpose of the required 'id' parameter. However, the optional 'fields' parameter is not mentioned in the description, and the schema has no parameter descriptions (0% coverage), so the description only partially compensates.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Fetch a single ad set by id', using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from list_adsets (which lists many) and from get_ad/get_campaign (different resource types).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage: use this when you need a single ad set by its ID. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions, though sibling tool names make the context reasonably clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/flin-agency/flin-meta-ads-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server