get_campaign
Retrieve a single LinkedIn Ads campaign by its ID. Access campaign details including selected fields for analysis.
Instructions
Fetch one campaign by id
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ad_account_id | No | ||
| id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Retrieve a single LinkedIn Ads campaign by its ID. Access campaign details including selected fields for analysis.
Fetch one campaign by id
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ad_account_id | No | ||
| id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It only states the basic operation, omitting whether the call is read-only, idempotent, or what happens on invalid id. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no fluff. It is front-loaded and efficient, though it could benefit from slight elaboration without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is inadequate. It does not explain optional parameters, return value structure, or error handling, leaving significant gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 0% description coverage, and the description adds no meaning beyond the parameter names. It fails to explain ad_account_id, fields, or their roles in the query.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Fetch one campaign by id' clearly states the action (fetch) and resource (campaign) with a specific identifier. It distinguishes from sibling tools like list_campaigns by implying a single item, but does not explicitly differentiate from get_campaign_group.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites (e.g., the id must be obtained from list_campaigns). The description lacks context for appropriate selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/flin-agency/flin-linkedin-ads-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server