flin-google-search-console-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to flin-google-search-console-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for Google Search Console data, enabling search analytics, URL inspection, indexing diagnostics, and sitemap management through MCP clients.12 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Google Search Console API that enables querying search analytics, managing sites, inspecting URLs, and supporting domain delegation via service accounts.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Google Search Console API, enabling search performance analysis, URL inspection, sitemap management, and property listing. Supports local, self-hosted, and Cloudflare Workers deployments.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for Google Search Console: performance queries, URL inspection, indexing checks, sitemaps, and one-call HTML SEO audit reports.17347 PyPI9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceSecure MCP server for Google Search Console. Query search analytics (clicks, impressions, CTR, position), manage sitemaps, inspect URL indexing status, and manage site properties.10AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Google Search Console, enabling querying site performance, URL inspection, sitemaps, and more via typed tools with OAuth authentication.1,431 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools are clearly distinct, but query_performance overlaps heavily with get_top_queries, get_top_pages, and get_dimension_breakdown, which are convenience wrappers around the same Search Analytics data. An agent may struggle to choose between the generic query tool and the specialized top-N tools.
Nearly all tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_sites, get_site_summary, query_performance, inspect_url). health_check is a minor deviation as a noun phrase, but overall naming remains predictable.
Eight tools are well-scoped for a Google Search Console analytics server. Each tool covers a distinct operation, and the count avoids both thinness and bloat.
The surface covers authentication status, site listing, aggregate metrics, flexible queries, top-N reports, dimension breakdowns, and URL inspection status. Minor gaps exist around sitemap management and requesting indexing, but core read-oriented workflows are complete.