Skip to main content
Glama
flaviofilipe

kali-security-bridge

by flaviofilipe
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to kali-security-bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • nerv-break-GenflowAi

      xscope0
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for security analysis, reverse engineering, and penetration testing, providing 70+ tools (nmap, sqlmap, hydra, frida, etc.) with configurable backends (Docker Kali, WSL, SSH).
      -

    • Arsenal MCP

      afhultin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A Kali Linux-based MCP server that exposes over 45 penetration testing tools for AI-assisted security auditing and vulnerability scanning. It features strict scope enforcement, structured output parsing, and persistent finding storage to automate the offensive security workflow.
      MIT

    • Kali MCP Server

      t1964n
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Docker-based MCP server exposing a curated set of Kali Linux security tools for authorized, hands-on network scanning on private ranges, with enforced trustworthiness and honest output.
      -

    • Pentest MCP Toolkit

      KoaBrown
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing Kali Linux security tools for authorized penetration testing, with tiered tool sets for network scanning, web testing, and more, run via Docker stdio.
      1
      MIT

    • redteam-mcp

      samirjani03
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A penetration testing MCP server that runs 20 hacking tools inside a Kali Linux Docker container, enabling AI assistants to execute security scans and attacks via natural language.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly differentiated by scanner/tool name (nmap, subfinder, nikto, sqlmap, etc.) and phase (recon, scanning, evidence). The main confusion points are scan_diretorios_gobuster vs scan_fuzzing_ffuf and scan_vulnerabilidades_nikto vs scan_nuclei, but descriptions state when each should be used.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use lowercase snake_case and generally follow an action_object_tool pattern (scan_portas_nmap, enum_subdominios_subfinder). The main inconsistency is the scan_ prefix appearing on some tools but not on other action-first names like brute_force_hydra, screenshot_gowitness, or fazer_requisicao_http.

    Tool Count3/5

    25 tools is at the threshold where the set starts to feel heavy. While a pentest suite justifies many specialized scanners, several tools overlap in function (directory enumeration, generic web vulnerability scanning), so the count is not as lean as it could be.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the full lifecycle from authorization and recon through scanning, evidence collection, findings listing, and report generation, plus session resume. Minor gaps exist around triage/management of findings (no update/delete or false-positive marking), but core pentest workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources