get_listing

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so full burden falls on description. It states 'get full details' implying a read operation, but lacks disclosure on authentication requirements, error behavior (e.g., nonexistent ID), rate limits, or whether it modifies state. Minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with key action. No wasted words. Efficiently conveys purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool without output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks explanation of what 'full details' includes in the response, and does not cover error handling or prerequisites. Could be more complete without being verbose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with parameter 'listing_id' described as 'Facebook Marketplace listing ID'. Description adds no further meaning; baseline 3 is appropriate as schema already explains the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description specifically states 'Get full details for a specific Facebook Marketplace listing', clearly identifying the verb, resource, and scope. It differentiates from sibling tools like search_listings which return multiple results.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when or when not to use this tool. Does not mention alternatives like search_listings for finding listings by criteria or list_monitors for monitors. The description only implies it is for a specific listing ID.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.