clear_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses the destructive nature (delete all nodes) and includes a warning. Without annotations, the description carries full burden; it doesn't mention undo, recovery, or effects on other pages, leaving gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: one sentence with a parenthetical warning. Front-loaded, no wasted words. Slightly could be improved with more structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive tool with no parameters and no output schema, the lack of details on recovery, scope (current page only), and side effects makes it somewhat incomplete. Adequate but could be more informative.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters in schema, so description coverage is 100% by default. Baseline score of 4 applies; description doesn't need to add parameter info.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action: 'Delete all nodes on the current page'. Specific verb+resource, and distinct from sibling tools which are more targeted (e.g., add_text, rectangle).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Only provides a cautionary note ('use carefully!'), but no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, or any prerequisites or restrictions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.