india_macro_indicators

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions the data source (World Bank) and that it is free, but does not disclose data freshness, update frequency, rate limits, or what happens if data is unavailable. The list of provided metrics is useful but behavioral traits are largely missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is reasonably structured with a clear first line and bullet list, but the pricing paragraph ('Bloomberg and Refinitiv charge...') is extraneous for tool selection and adds length. The example is helpful. It could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters and an existing output schema, the description adequately explains what the tool returns and its source. It lists all indicators and includes a usage example. Minor gaps: units of measurement are not mentioned, but overall the description is sufficient for a simple data retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the input schema coverage is 100%. The description adds value by enumerating the specific indicators returned, which is beyond what the schema provides. With no parameters, a baseline of 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it provides India macroeconomic indicators from the World Bank, listing specific indicators like CPI inflation, GDP growth, current account, etc. It distinguishes itself from siblings (e.g., rbi_policy_rates, india_gsec_yields) by covering a broad set of macro data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies it is for general macro data retrieval, exemplified by 'india_macro_indicators() → Latest India macro data'. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this vs. other macro tools like rbi_policy_rates or india_gsec_yields, nor does it mention when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.